GII v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 38 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 6 March 2025 concerning Criminal Law, specifically addressing appeal and offences. The judgment was delivered by Sundaresh Menon. The case was brought by GII (appellant) against Public Prosecutor (respondent). Legal representation was provided by WongPartnership LLP and Attorney-General's Chambers. The judgment cites 18 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code, the Evidence Act, and the Penal Code. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
[2025] SGHC 38 explained
GII v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2025] SGHC 38) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 6 March 2025. It is categorised under Criminal Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 2 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 38 about?
GII v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2025] SGHC 38) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Law — Appeal” and “Criminal Law — Offences — Outrage of modesty — Whether the complainant’s testimony was unusually convincing”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 38 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), Evidence Act (Cap 97), and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 38?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 38 has been cited by 2 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
A man appealed against his conviction for aggravated outrage of modesty under s 354A(1) of the Penal Code and his 50-month imprisonment sentence, maintaining he did not remember the events as he was heavily intoxicated. The Chief Justice dismissed the appeal, upholding the complainant's testimony as unusually convincing and addressing the evidentiary treatment when an accused claims no memory of the alleged offence rather than advancing a competing account.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 38?
[2025] SGHC 38 (GII v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 6 March 2025 addressing Criminal Law, specifically appeal and offences. The judgment was delivered by Sundaresh Menon.
Who were the parties in GII v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR?
The appellant in [2025] SGHC 38 was GII, and the respondent was Public Prosecutor. Legal representation included WongPartnership LLP and Attorney-General's Chambers. The case was decided on 6 March 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 38?
[2025] SGHC 38 was delivered by Sundaresh Menon in the High Court (General Division) on 6 March 2025. The case concerned Criminal Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 38 cite?
[2025] SGHC 38 cites 18 prior decisions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Evidence Act, Penal Code. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (18)
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Sentencing outcomes for this offence
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 38)