TAN & AU LLP & Anor v GOH TEH LEE
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 123 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 1 July 2025 concerning Insolvency Law, specifically addressing bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim. The case was brought by Tan & Au LLP and others (plaintiff) against Goh Teh Lee (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Advocatus Law LLP. The judgment cites 5 cases and references 4 statutory provisions, including the Bankruptcy Act, the In the matter of the Bankruptcy Act, and the Insolvency.
Summary
A bankrupt applied to reduce his monthly contribution and target contribution set by the Official Assignee under s 86D(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, after the OA issued a replacement certificate correcting an earlier erroneous certificate. The court held the OA has power to issue a replacement certificate to correct errors, applied a standard of review examining whether the OA's decision was unreasonable or perverse, and reduced the monthly contribution from $100 to $50 given the bankrupt's age (68) and health conditions.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 123?
[2025] SGHC 123 (TAN & AU LLP & Anor v GOH TEH LEE) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 1 July 2025 addressing Insolvency Law, specifically bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim.
Who were the parties in TAN & AU LLP & Anor v GOH TEH LEE?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 123 was Tan & Au LLP, Tan Beng Hui Carolyn, and the defendant was Goh Teh Lee. Legal representation included Insolvency & Public Trustee's Office and Advocatus Law LLP. The case was decided on 1 July 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 123?
[2025] SGHC 123 was delivered by Audrey Lim in the High Court (General Division) on 1 July 2025. The case concerned Insolvency Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 123 cite?
[2025] SGHC 123 cites 5 prior decisions. It references Bankruptcy Act, In the matter of the Bankruptcy Act, Insolvency.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (5)
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 123)