TAN KIAN CHYE v ANG SIEW YAN & 2 Ors

[2024] SGHCR 5 High Court Registrar 5 April 2024 • HC/OC 568/2023 ( HC/SUM 450/2024 ) • 72 min read
24 cases cited (23 SG, 1 foreign) Cited by 2 cases

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (6)

Parties (4)

Case Significance

Tan Kian Chye v Ang Siew Yan and others [2024] SGHCR 5 was a Grounds of Decision issued by the General Division of the High Court of Singapore on 5 April 2024, in Originating Claim No 568 of 2023 (Summons No 450 of 2024), with Assistant Registrar Perry Peh deciding the matter following hearings on 15 and 26 March 2024. The application, Summons No 450 of 2024, was brought by the claimant, Tan Kian Chye, to amend his Statement of Claim, and was resisted by the first defendant, Ang Siew Yan. The second and third defendants were Ang Boon Chong and Tan Sing Haiang @ Chen Chin Sien. The first defendant's principal contention was that the claimant should not be allowed to amend the Statement of Claim to pursue claims premised on positions seemingly inconsistent with positions he had taken earlier in proceedings concerning the division of matrimonial property in the Family Justice Courts, and in a previous application, Summons No 2927 of 2023. On that basis she argued the amended claim was precluded by the doctrine of approbation and reprobation and/or was an abuse of process liable to be struck out under O 9 r 16(1)(b) of the Rules of Court 2021. The Assistant Registrar accepted that the amended claims were premised on positions inconsistent with those previously taken, but noted that the claimant's previous and current positions had been taken in respect of different matters. The claimant was represented by Harry Elias Partnership and the defendant by Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP, with the judgment referencing the Trustees Act.

[2024] SGHCR 5 explained

TAN KIAN CHYE v ANG SIEW YAN & 2 Ors ([2024] SGHCR 5) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court Registrar on 5 April 2024. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 2 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHCR 5 about?

TAN KIAN CHYE v ANG SIEW YAN & 2 Ors ([2024] SGHCR 5) is a High Court Registrar decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Pleadings — Amendment”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHCR 5 consider?

The judgment refers to Trustees Act (Cap 337). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

How influential is [2024] SGHCR 5?

Within this corpus, [2024] SGHCR 5 has been cited by 2 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

Summary

In the General Division of the High Court, the claimant in HC/OC 568/2023 applied to amend his Statement of Claim, which the first defendant (his former wife) resisted on the basis that the amended claims relied on positions inconsistent with those he had taken in earlier matrimonial-property proceedings, such that the doctrine of approbation and reprobation and the rule against abuse of process barred the amendments. Assistant Registrar Perry Peh accepted that the positions were inconsistent but held that, because they concerned distinct subject matter, the inconsistency did not preclude the amended claim and did not show the claim was an abuse of process. He therefore saw no ground to refuse the amendments and allowed the application.

What was the issue in Tan Kian Chye v Ang Siew Yan [2024] SGHCR 5?

The case concerned the claimant Tan Kian Chye's application in Summons No 450 of 2024 to amend his Statement of Claim in Originating Claim No 568 of 2023. The first defendant, Ang Siew Yan, resisted it, arguing the amendments were precluded by approbation and reprobation and an abuse of process.

Why did the first defendant oppose the amendment in [2024] SGHCR 5?

Ang Siew Yan argued the claimant sought to pursue claims premised on positions inconsistent with those he had taken in earlier Family Justice Courts proceedings on matrimonial property division and in Summons No 2927 of 2023, making the amended claim an abuse of process liable to be struck out under O 9 r 16(1)(b) of the Rules of Court 2021.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (24)

SG (3)
[2019] SGCA 61 [2023] SGHC 216 [2023] SGHCR 11
SLR (20)
[1993] 3 SLR(R) 640 [1994] 3 SLR(R) 188 [1997] 1 SLR(R) 228 [1997] 3 SLR(R) 649 [2004] 2 SLR(R) 173 [2006] 1 SLR(R) 112 [2007] 3 SLR(R) 537 [2009] 2 SLR(R) 332 [2012] 1 SLR 457 [2012] 4 SLR 546 [2013] 3 SLR 455 [2014] 3 SLR 1048 [2015] 1 SLR 875 [2015] 5 SLR 962 [2017] 3 SLR 559 [2018] 1 SLR 1015 [2020] 1 SLR 1296 [2021] 1 SLR 342 [2022] 2 SLR 1018 [2024] 3 SLR 544
UK (1)
[1990] 1 WLR 1320

Cited By (2)

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHCR 5)