WQX v WQW
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Parties (3)
Case Significance
WQX v WQW and another appeal [2024] SGHCF 18 is a reserved judgment of the General Division of the High Court (Family Division), comprising District Court Appeals Nos 59 and 60 of 2023, heard on 14 March 2024 and delivered by Choo Han Teck J on 27 March 2024. The proceedings concerned cross-applications for divorce between a husband, described as a 51-year-old accountant, and a wife, described as a 45-year-old tutor, together with a co-respondent described as a 51-year-old executive. The District Judge below had granted interim judgments on both the husband's claim of unreasonable behaviour and the wife's counterclaim based on unreasonable behaviour and adultery with the co-respondent. The husband and co-respondent appealed against the finding of adultery, and the husband appealed against the finding of unreasonable behaviour. The wife was represented by Narayanan Vijya Kumar, while the husband and co-respondent were represented by John Vincent and Nevinjit Singh respectively. The catchwords identify the matters in issue as the evidence and proof of adultery and behaviour as a ground for divorce.
Summary
In these consolidated District Court appeals in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division), a husband who is an accountant and a co-respondent appealed against a district judge's findings that they had committed adultery, and the husband also appealed against a finding that his behaviour had been unreasonable, in cross-applications for divorce in which interim judgments had been granted to both the husband and the wife. The court considered the applicable standard of proof for adultery and whether the wife had discharged the burden of proof on the evidence adduced. The court dismissed the appeals of the husband and the co-respondent and ordered costs of $2,000 against each of the appellants.
What was WQX v WQW [2024] SGHCF 18 about?
Decided by Choo Han Teck J on 27 March 2024, the case involved cross-appeals (District Court Appeals Nos 59 and 60 of 2023) in divorce proceedings between a husband and wife, with a co-respondent. The appeals challenged the District Judge's findings of adultery and unreasonable behaviour as grounds for divorce.
Who were the parties and counsel in [2024] SGHCF 18?
The anonymised parties were the husband (WQX), the wife (WQW) and the co-respondent (WQV). The wife was represented by Narayanan Vijya Kumar, while the husband and co-respondent were represented by John Vincent and Nevinjit Singh respectively, in proceedings decided by Choo Han Teck J.
Cases Cited (1)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHCF 18)