WUA v WUB
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Attorneys Inc LLC, Withers KhattarWong LLP, Cheong Zhihui Ivan, Ho Jin Kit Shaun, Tan Hiang Teck Simon |
Source: [2024] SGHCF 10, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
WUA v WUB [2024] SGHCF 10 was decided in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division) by Choo Han Teck J on 6 February 2024, in Divorce Transferred No 2553 of 2020. The parties had been married for 21 years, with interim judgment delivered on 30 September 2020. The plaintiff husband was the CEO and majority shareholder of his company, and the defendant wife was a director of business management in another company. They had two children, aged 21 and 18, and the proceedings concerned the division of matrimonial assets and the children's maintenance.
The parties agreed that the pool of matrimonial assets was to be ascertained as at the interim judgment date and valued as at the ancillary matters hearing date, save for bank account and CPF account balances. The judgment set out the court's valuation of undisputed assets, including the matrimonial home valued at $1,297,500.00 (between the husband's figure of $1,295,000 and the wife's $1,300,000), investment accounts of $74,889.38, SCB accounts of $8,864.14, CPF accounts of $271,108.85, shares in a Philip Securities account of $22,489.50, a Manulife policy of $17,302.36 and a deVere policy valued at $12,108.47. The catchwords record the issue as Family Law — Matrimonial assets — Division.
Summary
WUA, the husband, and WUB, the wife, who were married for 21 years, came before the Family Division of the High Court for the division of matrimonial assets and the maintenance of their two children following interim judgment of divorce. The court determined the valuation of various assets, including the matrimonial home, investment and bank accounts, insurance policies and CPF balances, and assessed the children's reasonable monthly expenses at about $6,441.60. The court ordered that the husband bear about 30% of the children's maintenance and the wife 70%, and directed that each party bear its own costs.
What did WUA v WUB [2024] SGHCF 10 decide?
WUA v WUB [2024] SGHCF 10 addressed the division of matrimonial assets and children's maintenance after a 21-year marriage. Choo Han Teck J valued undisputed assets, including the matrimonial home at $1,297,500 and CPF accounts at $271,108.85, ascertaining the asset pool at the interim judgment date.
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHCF 10)