PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Muhammad Hanafi Bin Abdul Talip and Mohamed Nagib Bin Awang

[2024] SGHC 319 High Court (General Division) 16 December 2024 • HC/CC 24/2023 • 120 min read
26 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (11)

Parties (3)

Case Significance

Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Hanafi bin Abdul Talip and another [2024] SGHC 319 is a judgment of the General Division of the High Court delivered by Hoo Sheau Peng J on 16 December 2024, in Criminal Case No 24 of 2023. It was a joint trial of two accused persons, Mr Muhammad Hanafi bin Abdul Talip and Mr Mohamed Nagib bin Awang, on charges under the Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed).

Hanafi claimed trial to two charges under s 5(1)(a) read with s 5(2) of the MDA for possession for the purpose of trafficking, on 27 April 2021, of five packets containing not less than 58.86g of diamorphine and four blocks containing not less than 499.99g of vegetable matter found to be cannabis; Nagib claimed trial to two charges of trafficking under s 5(1)(a) for delivering those bundles and blocks to Hanafi. The judgment records that, for the charges relating to the diamorphine bundles but not the cannabis blocks, the death penalty is prescribed, and that the Prosecution proceeded with further non-capital charges, four against Hanafi and three against Nagib, to which both indicated no substantive defence. The Prosecution was represented by the Attorney-General's Chambers, with defence counsel from Damodara Ong LLC, Dora Boon & Company and Sureshan LLC. The judgment cites 26 Singapore authorities and references statutes including the Misuse of Drugs Act and the Criminal Procedure Code.

Summary

In this joint trial in the General Division of the High Court, the Public Prosecutor brought charges against Muhammad Hanafi bin Abdul Talip and Mohamed Nagib bin Awang under the Misuse of Drugs Act, including capital charges concerning five packets containing not less than 58.86g of diamorphine, alongside charges relating to four blocks of cannabis and further non-capital charges to which the accused offered no substantive defence. The Prosecution's case was that on 27 April 2021 Nagib collected a consignment of drugs and passed it to Hanafi, who placed it in his backpack intending to supply it to others, before both were arrested. The court convicted both accused on the remaining non-capital charges and proceeded to the sentencing stage.

What were the charges in Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Hanafi bin Abdul Talip [2024] SGHC 319?

In [2024] SGHC 319, Hanafi faced two charges under s 5(1)(a) read with s 5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act for possessing for trafficking, on 27 April 2021, not less than 58.86g of diamorphine and 499.99g of cannabis, while Nagib faced two trafficking charges for delivering them.

Which charge attracted the death penalty in the Hanafi and Nagib drug trafficking trial?

In Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Hanafi bin Abdul Talip [2024] SGHC 319, Hoo Sheau Peng J noted that the death penalty is prescribed for the charges relating to the five packets of not less than 58.86g of diamorphine, but not for those relating to the cannabis blocks.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (26)

SG (5)
[2003] SGCA 17 [2017] SGHC 290 [2020] SGHC 33 [2023] SGHC 165 [2023] SGHC 170
SLR (21)
[1996] 2 SLR(R) 178 [1998] 1 SLR(R) 591 [1998] 3 SLR(R) 619 [2017] 1 SLR 427 [2017] 1 SLR 820 [2017] 3 SLR 66 [2017] 5 SLR 1081 [2018] 1 SLR 499 [2018] 2 SLR 1119 [2019] 1 SLR 1003 [2019] 1 SLR 440 [2019] 2 SLR 254 [2020] 1 SLR 486 [2021] 1 SLR 180 [2021] 1 SLR 557 [2021] 1 SLR 744 [2022] 2 SLR 1362 [2022] 2 SLR 538 [2022] 2 SLR 676 [2022] 2 SLR 778 [2022] 5 SLR 640

Cited By (1)

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 319)