Mohamad Shafee Khamis
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Sundaresh Menon |
| Charges / claim | Legal Profession |
| Counsel | Allen & Gledhill LLP, Attorney-General's Chambers, Avery Chong Law Practice, Chong Soon Yong Avery, Fu Qijing, Lee Hui Min, Prabu Devaraj, Sanjiv Rajan, Sean Koh Yi Wei |
Source: [2024] SGHC 274, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (9)
Parties (1)
Case Significance
Re Mohamad Shafee Khamis [2024] SGHC 274 was a decision of the General Division of the High Court delivered by Sundaresh Menon CJ on 28 October 2024, in Admission of Advocates and Solicitors No 336 of 2023 (Summonses Nos 966 and 1072 of 2024). The application, brought by Mohamad Shafee Khamis, was made under Section 12 of the Legal Profession Act 1966 and Rule 25 of the Legal Profession (Admission) Rules 2011 for admission to the legal profession. In his judgment, Sundaresh Menon CJ observed that the court acts as the gatekeeper for admission to the profession, ensuring entrants possess not only competence but also the qualities of professionalism and probity necessary to maintain public trust in the justice system, and noted that recent jurisprudence on contested admission applications has focused on the applicant's character at the time of application, with the primary consideration being whether the applicant has been sufficiently rehabilitated, citing Re Wong Wai Loong Sean and other matters [2023] 4 SLR 541. The applicant had earlier faced ten charges under the Films Act. Allen & Gledhill LLP acted for the Law Society of Singapore, the Attorney-General's Chambers for the Attorney-General, and Avery Chong Law Practice for the Singapore Institute of Legal Education.
[2024] SGHC 274 explained
Mohamad Shafee Khamis ([2024] SGHC 274) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 28 October 2024. It is categorised under Legal Profession. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHC 274 about?
Mohamad Shafee Khamis ([2024] SGHC 274) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Legal Profession — Admission”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 274 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), Films Act, Legal Profession Act (Cap 161), and Penal Code (Cap 224), among other provisions. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2024] SGHC 274 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGCA 36. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2024] SGHC 274?
Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC 274 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
What was Re Mohamad Shafee Khamis [2024] SGHC 274 about?
It was a contested application by Mohamad Shafee Khamis for admission to the legal profession under Section 12 of the Legal Profession Act 1966 and Rule 25 of the Legal Profession (Admission) Rules 2011, heard by Sundaresh Menon CJ; the applicant had earlier faced ten charges under the Films Act.
How did the court approach admission in Re Mohamad Shafee Khamis [2024] SGHC 274?
Sundaresh Menon CJ noted the court acts as gatekeeper to the profession, requiring competence, professionalism and probity. Recent jurisprudence on contested admissions focuses on the applicant's character at the time of application, with rehabilitation the primary consideration, citing Re Wong Wai Loong Sean [2023] 4 SLR 541.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (21)
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 274)