LEE CHENG LING v ARGYLE FUND INVESTMENTS PTE. LTD.

Q: Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 252 consider?

The judgment refers to Civil Law Act (Cap 43) and Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

[2024] SGHC 252 High Court (General Division) 10 October 2024 HC/OA 163/2024 25 min read

7 cases cited

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	10 October 2024
Judge	Valerie Thean
Charges / claim	Trusts
Counsel	Nakoorsha Law Corporation, PDLegal LLC, Prolegis LLC, Chua Ze Xuan, Ker Yanguang, Low Hui Xuan Carrisa, Michelle Tang Hui Ming, Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir, Nazim Khan, Rasveen Kaur, Tan Yi Liang

Source: [2024] SGHC 252, High Court (General Division), decided 10 October 2024 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Trusts — Resulting trusts — Presumed resulting trusts Trusts — Constructive trusts — Common intention constructive trusts

Practice Areas

Trusts

Judges (1)

Valerie Thean Delivered

Counsel (11)

Nakoorsha Law Corporation Firm PDLegal LLC Firm Prolegis LLC Firm Chua Ze Xuan Counsel Respondent Ker Yanguang Counsel Respondent Low Hui Xuan Carrisa Counsel Respondent Michelle Tang Hui Ming Counsel Applicant Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir Counsel Applicant Nazim Khan Counsel Respondent Rasveen Kaur Counsel Applicant Tan Yi Liang Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

Argyle Fund Investments Pte Ltd Respondent Lee Cheng Ling Applicant Lim Chih Li @ Jared Lim Chih Li Respondent

Case Significance

In Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments Pte Ltd and another [2024] SGHC 252, the General Division of the High Court determined Originating Application No 163 of 2024, which concerned a property held in the names of the applicant, Mdm Lee Cheng Ling, and her husband, the second respondent, Mr Lim Chih Li @ Jared Lim Chih Li, as joint tenants. The property had been purchased for $5,250,000, with completion on 3 September 2012, and the Lims financed the purchase with a mortgage loan in both their names from OCBC Bank for $4,173,000.

In earlier and separate proceedings (HC/OC 396/2023), the first respondent, Argyle Fund Investments Pte Ltd, had obtained summary judgment in its favour for the sum of $10,000,000 plus interest and costs. As Mr Lim had failed to respond to Argyle's demands for payment, Argyle commenced enforcement proceedings (HC/EO 141/2023) seeking to seize Mr Lim's half-share in the property. The case was analysed by Valerie Thean J through the lenses of presumed resulting trusts and common intention constructive trusts. The matter was heard on 15 August and 23 September 2024, with the grounds of decision issued on 10 October 2024. Nakoorsha Law Corporation acted for the applicant, while PDLegal LLC and Prolegis LLC acted for the respondents.

[2024] SGHC 252 explained

LEE CHENG LING v ARGYLE FUND INVESTMENTS PTE. LTD. ([2024] SGHC 252) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 10 October 2024. It is categorised under Trusts. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC 252 about?

LEE CHENG LING v ARGYLE FUND INVESTMENTS PTE. LTD. ([2024] SGHC 252) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Trusts — Resulting trusts — Presumed resulting trusts” and “Trusts — Constructive trusts — Common intention constructive trusts”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 252 consider?

The judgment refers to Civil Law Act (Cap 43) and Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

Summary

This dispute before the General Division of the High Court concerned a property purchased for $5,250,000 and held by the applicant, Mdm Lee, and her husband, the second respondent, Mr Lim, as joint tenants. After the first respondent, Argyle, obtained summary judgment against Mr Lim and commenced enforcement proceedings seeking to seize his half-share, Mdm Lee applied to set aside the enforcement order and for a declaration that she was the sole beneficial owner of the property, raising issues of presumed resulting trust and common intention constructive trust. The court found that the Lims held equal beneficial ownership in the property and dismissed the application, ordering costs of $34,000 against Mdm Lee and Mr Lim on a joint and several basis.

What was at stake in Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments Pte Ltd [2024] SGHC 252?

The case concerned a property purchased for $5,250,000 and held by Mdm Lee Cheng Ling and her husband Mr Lim as joint tenants. After Argyle Fund Investments obtained summary judgment for $10,000,000 against Mr Lim, it sought to seize his half-share, raising trust questions before Valerie Thean J.

What trust principles did Valerie Thean J consider in [2024] SGHC 252?

Valerie Thean J analysed the dispute through presumed resulting trusts and common intention constructive trusts. The property was financed by a $4,173,000 OCBC Bank mortgage in both spouses' names, and the question arose in the context of Argyle's enforcement proceedings against Mr Lim's half-share.