Tan Heng Khoon t/a 360 VR Cars v Wang Shing He

[2024] SGHC 243 High Court (General Division) 18 September 2024 • HC/OA 596/2024 • 18 min read
15 cases cited Cited by 4 cases

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (2)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Tan Heng Khoon (trading as 360 VR Cars) v Wang Shing He [2024] SGHC 243 was a grounds of decision of Goh Yihan J in the General Division of the High Court of Singapore, dated 18 September 2024, following a hearing on 28 August 2024 in Originating Application No 596 of 2024, in the matter of DC/OC 457/2023. The application was for an extension of time to file and serve the Notice of Appeal against the decision of the District Court rendered in DC/RA 4/2024, where the applicant was also the appellant; the respondent, Wang Shing He, objected to the application. The catchwords identify the issue as an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal under Order 18 rule 17(2) of the Rules of Court 2021.

After hearing the parties, the court allowed the application on 28 August 2024 and directed the applicant to file and serve the Notice of Appeal for DC/RA 4/2024 by 11 September 2024. By way of background, the respondent had obtained a regular default judgment against the applicant on 5 May 2023 in the District Court (DC/JUD 737/2023), due to the applicant failing to file a Notice of Intention to Contest or Not Contest by the applicable deadline in the respondent's action in DC/OC 457/2023; that judgment ordered the applicant to pay the respondent $175,000.00 plus interest, with costs. On 11 January 2024, the Deputy Registrar allowed the applicant's application in DC/SUM 2055/2023 to set aside the judgment. The respondent was represented by Fan Kin Ning of Tan Kim Seng & Partners.

[2024] SGHC 243 explained

Tan Heng Khoon t/a 360 VR Cars v Wang Shing He ([2024] SGHC 243) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 18 September 2024. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 4 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC 243 about?

Tan Heng Khoon t/a 360 VR Cars v Wang Shing He ([2024] SGHC 243) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Extension of time — Extension of time to file and serve notice of appeal — Order 18 rule 17(2) Rules of Court 2021”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

How influential is [2024] SGHC 243?

Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC 243 has been cited by 4 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

Summary

Tan Heng Khoon, trading as 360 VR Cars, applied for an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal against a District Court decision in DC/RA 4/2024, which the respondent Wang Shing He opposed, the matter being governed by the principles for extensions of time under the Rules of Court 2021. Goh Yihan J allowed the application, directing that the notice of appeal be filed and served by 11 September 2024. The court found that the respondent could point to no prejudice beyond the usual prejudice arising from permitting an appeal to be filed out of time.

What did Tan Heng Khoon t/a 360 VR Cars v Wang Shing He [2024] SGHC 243 decide?

Goh Yihan J allowed the applicant's application on 28 August 2024 for an extension of time to file and serve the Notice of Appeal in DC/RA 4/2024, under Order 18 rule 17(2) of the Rules of Court 2021, directing service by 11 September 2024.

What was the underlying default judgment in [2024] SGHC 243?

On 5 May 2023, Wang Shing He obtained a regular default judgment in the District Court (DC/JUD 737/2023) ordering Tan Heng Khoon to pay $175,000.00 plus interest and costs, after he failed to file a Notice of Intention to Contest in DC/OC 457/2023.

Cases Cited (15)

SG (4)
[2001] SGHC 87 [2005] SGCA 3 [2021] SGHC 74 [2023] SGHC(A) 5
SLR (11)
[1991] 2 SLR(R) 260 [2000] 1 SLR(R) 482 [2001] 3 SLR(R) 355 [2002] 1 SLR(R) 633 [2004] 2 SLR(R) 505 [2006] 2 SLR(R) 565 [2008] 1 SLR(R) 757 [2011] 1 SLR 1263 [2011] 2 SLR 196 [2014] 4 SLR 202 [2021] 3 SLR 725

Cited By (4)

Referenced in

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 243)