PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Muhamad Akashah Aizad Bin Hasni

[2024] SGHC 223 High Court (General Division) 30 August 2024 • HC/CC 21/2024 • 73 min read
42 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Public Prosecutor v Muhamad Akashah Aizad bin Hasni [2024] SGHC 223 was decided by Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J in the General Division of the High Court, heard on 31 July 2024 and decided on 30 August 2024, in Criminal Case No 21 of 2024. The matter concerned statutory offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 186, 2008 Rev Ed) and sentencing, and the grounds of decision also refer to the Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act, the Penal Code and the Prisons Act.

According to the judgment, since the Sentencing Advisory Panel issued the Guidelines on Reduction in Sentences for Guilty Pleas on 1 October 2023, a number of cases had come before the General Division of the High Court in which accused persons pleaded guilty to trafficking and/or importing drugs in quantities falling just below the capital threshold under the MDA, for example 499.99g of cannabis, 14.99g of diamorphine, and 249.99g of methamphetamine. The judgment notes that in PP v Iskandar bin Jinan and another [2024] SGHC 134, where the accused pleaded guilty to a charge of trafficking in not less than 14.99g of diamorphine under s 5(1)(a) punishable under s 33(1) of the MDA, the prosecution took the position that the maximum sentencing discount for a plea of guilt in such trafficking and importation cases should be 10% rather than the 30% provided in the Sentencing Guidelines, while the defence objected and argued for a case-by-case assessment. The judgment head is truncated and does not state the final sentence imposed on the defendant, Muhamad Akashah Aizad bin Hasni.

Summary

In this case before the General Division of the High Court, the accused, Muhamad Akashah Aizad bin Hasni, pleaded guilty to a charge under section 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act, punishable under section 33(1), for the unauthorised importing of drugs into Singapore. The decision addressed the sentencing approach for guilty pleas in drug trafficking and importation cases where quantities fall just below the capital threshold, following the Guidelines on Reduction in Sentences for Guilty Pleas and the earlier decision in PP v Iskandar bin Jinan. The grounds reviewed how sentencing discounts for guilty pleas should be applied in such cases.

What issue did Public Prosecutor v Muhamad Akashah Aizad bin Hasni [2024] SGHC 223 concern?

Public Prosecutor v Muhamad Akashah Aizad bin Hasni [2024] SGHC 223, before Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J, concerned sentencing under the Misuse of Drugs Act and the sentencing discount for a guilty plea where the drug quantity fell just below the capital threshold.

What position did the prosecution take on guilty-plea discounts as noted in [2024] SGHC 223?

As noted in [2024] SGHC 223, in PP v Iskandar bin Jinan [2024] SGHC 134 the prosecution took the position that for trafficking and importation cases the maximum guilty-plea discount should be 10% rather than the 30% in the Sentencing Guidelines, while the defence argued for case-by-case assessment.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (42)

SG (15)
[2016] SGDC 214 [2017] SGHC 168 [2018] SGHC 97 [2019] SGHC 151 [2020] SGHC 107 [2020] SGHC 203 [2021] SGCA 15 [2021] SGCA 32 [2021] SGHC 111 [2021] SGHC 151 [2021] SGHC 97 [2022] SGHC 160 [2022] SGHC 99 [2024] SGHC 134 [2024] SGHC 171
SLR (27)
[1993] 2 SLR(R) 406 [1995] 1 SLR(R) 1 [1999] 3 SLR(R) 257 [2002] 1 SLR(R) 182 [2006] 4 SLR(R) 653 [2012] 3 SLR 776 [2012] 4 SLR 947 [2013] 1 SLR 39 [2015] 5 SLR 122 [2016] 5 SLR 1289 [2017] 1 SLR 173 [2017] 2 SLR 115 [2017] 2 SLR 449 [2017] 2 SLR 571 [2017] 2 SLR 68 [2018] 2 SLR 557 [2018] 5 SLR 799 [2019] 2 SLR 764 [2019] 3 SLR 568 [2019] 4 SLR 838 [2020] 1 SLR 266 [2020] 4 SLR 1255 [2020] 5 SLR 734 [2020] 5 SLR 807 [2021] 2 SLR 299 [2022] 2 SLR 1432 [2023] 3 SLR 440

Cited By (1)

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 223)