GHI v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

[2024] SGHC 220 High Court (General Division) 29 August 2024 HC/MA 9092/2023/01 49 min read
10 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

I dismissed the appeal against conviction.

Source: [2024] SGHC 220, High Court (General Division), decided 29 August 2024. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Vincent Hoong
Charges / claim Criminal Law
Outcome Appeal dismissed
Counsel Attorney-General's Chambers, Lee Bon Leong & Co, Jeffrey Beh, Shaun Sim, Timotheus Koh

Source: [2024] SGHC 220, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (5)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

GHI v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 220 was decided by Vincent Hoong J in the General Division of the High Court, heard on 2 April 2024 and decided on 29 August 2024, in Magistrate's Appeal No 9092 of 2023. The case concerned a criminal appeal and statutory offences under the Penal Code, and the grounds of decision refer to the Criminal Procedure Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Evidence Act, the Penal Code and the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act.

In the introduction to the grounds of decision, Vincent Hoong J observed that the overriding aim of the criminal justice system is to ensure that justice is served while balancing the need to protect witnesses and maintain the integrity of the judicial process against the fundamental rights of the accused, and that effective cross-examination elicits evidence without aggressive, repetitive and oppressive questioning. The judgment discusses the use of shielding measures to recalibrate the power dynamics between the accused and the victim in view of the susceptibility of particular victims to harm, noting that such measures may be employed in cases involving alleged victims of a sexual offence or witnesses below 18 years of age, while preserving the presumption that the accused is innocent. The appellant was represented by counsel from Lee Bon Leong & Co, including Jeffrey Beh and Shaun Sim, and the respondent was represented by Timotheus Koh of the Attorney-General's Chambers. The judgment head is truncated and does not state the final disposition of the appeal.

[2024] SGHC 220 explained

GHI v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2024] SGHC 220) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 29 August 2024. It is categorised under Criminal Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC 220 about?

GHI v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2024] SGHC 220) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Law — Appeal” and “Criminal Law — Statutory offences — Penal Code”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 220 consider?

The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Act, Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), Evidence Act (Cap 97), and Penal Code (Cap 224), among other provisions. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

How influential is [2024] SGHC 220?

Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC 220 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

What did GHI v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 220 discuss?

GHI v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 220, before Vincent Hoong J in a Magistrate's Appeal, discussed the use of shielding measures for vulnerable witnesses, such as alleged victims of sexual offences or witnesses below 18, and the need to balance protecting witnesses against the accused's right to a fair trial.

Which court and judge decided GHI v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 220?

GHI v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGHC 220 was decided by Vincent Hoong J in the General Division of the High Court of Singapore, in Magistrate's Appeal No 9092 of 2023, heard on 2 April 2024 with the grounds of decision delivered on 29 August 2024.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (10)

SLR (10)
[1999] 3 SLR(R) 346 [2008] 1 SLR(R) 601 [2008] 4 SLR(R) 686 [2017] 5 SLR 904 [2018] 3 SLR 1048 [2018] 4 SLR 1315 [2019] 2 SLR 490 [2019] 3 SLR 749 [2020] 1 SLR 486 [2023] 1 SLR 1398

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 220)