Re: XERXES J. MEDORA

Q: Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 196 consider?

The judgment refers to Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20), Companies Act (Cap 50), In the matter of the Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20), and Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, among other provisions. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

[2024] SGHC 196 High Court (General Division) 31 July 2024 HC/OSB 14/2024 52 min read

24 cases cited (11 SG, 13 foreign)

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	31 July 2024
Judge	Aedit Abdullah
Charges / claim	Trusts, Equity, Insolvency Law
Counsel	Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP, WNLEX LLC, Chew Xiang, Lee Ming Hui Kelvin, Naomi Lim Bao Bao

Source: [2024] SGHC 196, High Court (General Division), decided 31 July 2024 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Trusts — Breach of trust — Remedies Equity — Fiduciary relationships — Breach of fiduciary duty — Remedies Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy — Proof of debt — Relevant date for valuation of proofs of debt Equity — Remedies — Account — Whether claim for an account is a claim for a liquidated or unliquidated sum Equity — Remedies — Whether remedies for breaches of trust and fiduciary duty are restitutionary in character Equity — Fiduciary relationships — Breach of fiduciary duty — Time of accrual of cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty Equity — Remedies — Equitable compensation — Whether claim for equitable compensation is a claim for a liquidated or unliquidated sum Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy — Trustee in bankruptcy — Application for directions — Section 40(2) Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20, 2009 Rev Ed) Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy — Proof of debt — Whether claim against bankrupt for breach of fiduciary duty is a provable debt — Section 87(3) Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20, 2009 Rev Ed)

Practice Areas

Trusts Equity Insolvency Law

Judges (1)

Aedit Abdullah Delivered

Counsel (5)

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP Firm WNLEX LLC Firm Chew Xiang Counsel Applicant Lee Ming Hui Kelvin Counsel Non-Party Naomi Lim Bao Bao Counsel Applicant

Parties (2)

Planar One & Associates Pte Ltd Non-Party Medora Xerxes Jamshid Applicant

Case Significance

Re Medora Xerxes Jamshid (in his capacity as the private trustee in bankruptcy of Tan Han Meng) (Planar One & Associates Pte Ltd (in liquidation), non-party) [2024] SGHC 196 was a grounds of decision of the General Division of the High Court delivered by Aedit Abdullah J on 31 July 2024, in Originating Summons (Bankruptcy) No 14 of 2024, following hearings on 3 April and 2 May 2024. The applicant was Mr Medora Xerxes Jamshid, the private trustee in bankruptcy of Tan Han Meng, represented by Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP, including Chew Xiang; the non-party was Planar One & Associates Pte Ltd (in liquidation), represented by WNLEX LLC.

The matter was an application for directions by the private trustee under section 40(2) of the Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20, 2009 Rev Ed). As reflected in the catchwords, it raised questions including whether a claim against a bankrupt for breach of fiduciary duty is a provable debt under section 87(3) of the Bankruptcy Act, the relevant date for valuation of proofs of debt, the time of accrual of a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty, whether a claim for an account or for equitable compensation is a claim for a liquidated or unliquidated sum, and whether remedies for breaches of trust and fiduciary duty are restitutionary in character.

[2024] SGHC 196 explained

Re: XERXES J. MEDORA ([2024] SGHC 196) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 31 July 2024. It is categorised under Trusts, Equity, and Insolvency Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC 196 about?

Re: XERXES J. MEDORA ([2024] SGHC 196) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Trusts — Breach of trust — Remedies”, “Equity — Fiduciary relationships — Breach of fiduciary duty — Remedies”, “Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy — Proof of debt — Relevant date for valuation of proofs of debt”, and “Equity — Remedies — Account — Whether claim for an account is a claim for a liquidated or unliquidated sum”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 196 consider?

The judgment refers to Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20), Companies Act (Cap 50), In the matter of the Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20), and Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, among other provisions. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2024] SGHC 196 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 105. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

Summary

Mr Medora Xerxes Jamshid, as the private trustee in bankruptcy of Tan Han Meng, applied for the court to determine various questions arising in the administration of the bankrupt's estate, including the novel issue of whether a claim against a bankrupt for breach of fiduciary duty is a provable debt in bankruptcy. The General Division of the High Court answered that question in the affirmative and set out its reasons in detail, addressing related matters of principle on the nature of claims for breach of trust and fiduciary duty. The court noted that its conclusions, though decided under the Bankruptcy Act, remained applicable to the regime under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.

What was Re Medora Xerxes Jamshid [2024] SGHC 196 about?

[2024] SGHC 196 was an application for directions by Mr Medora Xerxes Jamshid, the private trustee in bankruptcy of Tan Han Meng, under section 40(2) of the Bankruptcy Act, decided by Aedit Abdullah J on 31 July 2024 in Originating Summons (Bankruptcy) No 14 of 2024.

What insolvency issues did [2024] SGHC 196 address?

The decision addressed whether a claim against a bankrupt for breach of fiduciary duty is a provable debt under section 87(3) of the Bankruptcy Act, the relevant date for valuing proofs of debt, and whether claims for an account or equitable compensation are liquidated or unliquidated sums.