PRISCILLA LIM SUK LING & Anor v AMBER COMPOUNDING PHARMACY PTE. LTD. & Anor
Key facts
| Court | Court of Appeal |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Andrew Phang Boon Leong, Steven Chong, Sundaresh Menon |
| Charges / claim | Intellectual Property |
| Counsel | Cairnhill Law LLC, Pereira & Tan LLC, Chan Chee Yun Timothy, Derek Kang Yu Hsien, Pereira George Barnabas, Wong Pei Yee, Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn |
Source: [2024] SGCA 16, Court of Appeal, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
Lim Suk Ling Priscilla and another v Amber Compounding Pharmacy Pte Ltd and another [2024] SGCA 16 was decided by the Singapore Court of Appeal on 20 May 2024, in Civil Appeal No 38 of 2023. The grounds of decision were delivered by Steven Chong JCA, sitting with Sundaresh Menon CJ and Andrew Phang Boon Leong SJ, following the hearing on 26 March 2024. The matter concerned the law of confidence and breach of confidence. The court described the appeal as unusual in one significant aspect: it allowed the appeal even though it found that the judge below had been entirely correct on the issue argued before him. The appellants, Priscilla Lim Suk Ling and UrbanRx Compounding Pharmacy Pte Ltd, had entered into a consent judgment in an action for breach of confidence concerning numerous documents containing confidential information (the "Confidential Information") that were improperly obtained during the first appellant's part-time employment with the respondents, Amber Compounding Pharmacy Pte Ltd and Amber Laboratories Pte Ltd. Prior to the assessment of damages, and given the breadth of the pleadings, the judge had invited the parties to reach an agreement. The appellants were represented by Pereira & Tan LLC, and the respondents by Cairnhill Law LLC.
[2024] SGCA 16 explained
PRISCILLA LIM SUK LING & Anor v AMBER COMPOUNDING PHARMACY PTE. LTD. & Anor ([2024] SGCA 16) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Court of Appeal on 20 May 2024. It is categorised under Intellectual Property. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGCA 16 about?
PRISCILLA LIM SUK LING & Anor v AMBER COMPOUNDING PHARMACY PTE. LTD. & Anor ([2024] SGCA 16) is a Court of Appeal decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Intellectual Property — Law of confidence — Breach of confidence”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What was Lim Suk Ling Priscilla v Amber Compounding Pharmacy [2024] SGCA 16 about?
It was a Singapore Court of Appeal decision dated 20 May 2024 on the law of confidence. The appellants, Priscilla Lim Suk Ling and UrbanRx Compounding Pharmacy, had entered a consent judgment over confidential information improperly obtained during the first appellant's part-time employment with the Amber respondents.
Why did the Court of Appeal call [2024] SGCA 16 an unusual appeal?
Steven Chong JCA explained that the court allowed the appeal even though it found the judge below was entirely correct on the issue argued before him. The grounds of decision in Civil Appeal No 38 of 2023 were delivered on 20 May 2024 to explain this development.
Cases Cited (16)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGCA 16)